Comments on: Proof: Content spamming with javascript works http://colewhitelaw.com/search-marketing/seo/proof-content-spamming-works/ Cole is Digital Marketing Manager for a publishing company and has broad experience of online marketing from a varied career. Web geek, closet entrepreneur and general all round grammar pedant, he survives today to share the tales Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:07:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Cole http://colewhitelaw.com/search-marketing/seo/proof-content-spamming-works/#comment-793 Cole Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:13:42 +0000 http://colewhitelaw.com/?p=202#comment-793 David, I think you're getting a little ahead of yourself, let me explain at a lower level: The point of the article is that the only obvious mean by which this site is maintaining a high ranking is through the vast amount of content that is otherwise hidden from a normal user - pay attention, that's called content stuffing. Yes, I'm aware that a user can click on the button to see the content but they won't and that isn't the point. Hiding behind fake 'read more' buttons is simply a cynical exercise in getting as much content on the page for a search engine spider to crawl whilst not making the site look like a big long page of crap for a user. Please make at least an attempt to understand the post, or for that matter the subject, that you criticise in future. David, I think you’re getting a little ahead of yourself, let me explain at a lower level:

The point of the article is that the only obvious mean by which this site is maintaining a high ranking is through the vast amount of content that is otherwise hidden from a normal user – pay attention, that’s called content stuffing.

Yes, I’m aware that a user can click on the button to see the content but they won’t and that isn’t the point. Hiding behind fake ‘read more’ buttons is simply a cynical exercise in getting as much content on the page for a search engine spider to crawl whilst not making the site look like a big long page of crap for a user.

Please make at least an attempt to understand the post, or for that matter the subject, that you criticise in future.

]]> By: David http://colewhitelaw.com/search-marketing/seo/proof-content-spamming-works/#comment-785 David Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:44:49 +0000 http://colewhitelaw.com/?p=202#comment-785 Its not link stuffing. Pay attention. The extra content on that page will then become visible when you click on the tabs for the content. Its not link stuffing. Pay attention. The extra content on that page will then become visible when you click on the tabs for the content.

]]>