<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cole Whitelaw&#187; social interaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://colewhitelaw.com/tag/social-interaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://colewhitelaw.com</link>
	<description>Cole is Digital Marketing Manager for a publishing company and has broad experience of online marketing from a varied career.  Web geek, closet entrepreneur and general all round grammar pedant, he survives today to share the tales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:42:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social Network?  More like Social Not-work</title>
		<link>http://colewhitelaw.com/social-media/social-network-social-notwork/</link>
		<comments>http://colewhitelaw.com/social-media/social-network-social-notwork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barriers to entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stampede]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasteland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colewhitelaw.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very simply &#8211; Social media as a concept is muddied and amorphous.  Obviously, we&#8217;ve already seen a stampede of hip advertisers and cynical brands into those spaces; testing &#8216;messages&#8217;, ad models, cut through and viral activity.
As with every other media channel, barriers to entry creep lower and lower allowing far too many people to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very simply &#8211; Social media as a concept is muddied and amorphous.  Obviously, we&#8217;ve already seen a stampede of hip advertisers and cynical brands into those spaces; testing &#8216;messages&#8217;, ad models, cut through and viral activity.</p>
<p>As with every other media channel, barriers to entry creep lower and lower allowing far too many people to assume they &#8216;get&#8217; social media &#8211; I look out across this wasteland of faceless corporate profiles and think.</p>
<p><strong>We&#8217;re doing it wrong.</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-156"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s been <a href="http://furrier.org/2008/07/23/why-current-social-media-is-crashing-traditional-advertising-doesnt-listen-doesnt-work-for-social-media/">said</a> <a href="http://net-effect.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-can-we-help-brands-become-more.html">before</a>, advertising on a social network is like leaning into a conversation in a coffee shop and trying to sell something to someone you&#8217;ve never met, so many can&#8217;t turn a profit.</p>
<p>However I don&#8217;t want to talk about social networks from a branding, advertiser return or commercial perspective &#8211; if you don&#8217;t know how to <a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/">delight your customers</a> regardless of the tools they use to connect socially then I&#8217;m afraid blog posts won&#8217;t help you.</p>
<p>I want to talk about social networks from a users/members/profile&#8217;s perspective &#8211; which is simply this: social networks as we know them are broken.</p>
<p>As with portals, meta-based search and subsequently digg-style aggregators &#8211; mainstream innovation goes vertical and decays, and so shall social networks.  And here&#8217;s why:</p>
<h2>The problem with &#8216;traditional&#8217; networks</h2>
<p>I know, how ridiculous is it, calling something only a few years old traditional?</p>
<p>Aside from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-_B50PBaCg">rights issues</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing">astrotufing</a> and the usual rubbish that pollutes what i&#8217;ve heard (quite brilliantly) called &#8216;unnecessary and inane white noise&#8217;, the very mechanic by which facebook <em>et al</em> facilitate our social interaction is diametrically opposed to what we want from it as <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">customers</span> humans.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the construct of a maintained profile is the problem.  There&#8217;s far too much self-managed meta information, hardly any of it being as transient as we require from our fickle web travel.</p>
<h2>Social Networks work by attributes not behaviour</h2>
<p>Meta information you write yourself is rarely accurate, (See late-90s SEO).  So how on earth can real people, let alone automated algorithms or advertisers give you anything meaningful based on it?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com">Stumbleupon</a> is the closest to achieving something like this &#8211; I have snowboarding as an interest in my facebook profile so therefore see ad after ad for snow gear and holidays; Stumbleupon at least takes into account how rarely I actually read about it and serves content based on my behaviour, not just just my meta attributes.</p>
<h2>Social Networks erode social time</h2>
<p>Current social  networks have a value output which is <strong>proportional to the input</strong>.  Amplifying or dampening yes, but proportional.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t spent any time on Facebook in the last couple of months so it&#8217;s value to me has atrophied and I see it as low-value.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect">network effect</a> doesn&#8217;t translate to personal value.  In fact, one could argue that as the network size/ combined value increases , personal value  output falls, as more people are exposed to your profile, you are under more pressure to maintain it. This is the silver bullet for social networks.</p>
<p>Until we switch that equation around, <strong>there is no sustainable growth</strong> and not enough user delight, only cyclical rushes to sample the feature du jour.</p>
<h2>Value Output != Effort</h2>
<p>Of course there&#8217;s no such thing as a free lunch, but we&#8217;re privy to a suite of technologies that should make it easier to hook up in real life, not use up that very time gardening our presences on them.</p>
<p><strong>we need Social Facilitation not Social Networks.</strong></p>
<p>Web technologies should be harnessed to glean more from our time-poor lives not suck time on the platform in lieu of activities that it stands for.</p>
<p>But how do we fix it?</p>
<p>Honestly, who knows?  Obviously <a href="www.dataportability.org">data portability</a>, <a href="http://microformats.org/">micro formats</a>, <a href="http://www.gmpg.org/xfn/">voluntary relationship management</a> and of course, <a href="http://openid.net/">OpenID</a> are all options to create the first truly portable social network attribute set but that&#8217;s only half the battle.</p>
<h2>Voltron is the answer</h2>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 378px"><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/clintjcl/2715535659/"><img title="Image from ClintJCL - Voltron" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3026/2715535659_f64684ef7b.jpg" alt="Image from ClintJCL - Voltron" width="368" height="246" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image from ClintJCL - Voltron</p></div>
<p>I think the concept of the social network should be like Voltron.  Except instead of 21 vehicles (or 5 lions for you hardcore fans), we&#8217;d have thousands of independant nodes providing focused funtionality &#8211; the ability to get more out of your life and transferrable, predictive recommendations that take the meta data management out of our hands; two very different examples of ways to achieve this are <a href="http://www.thefilter.com">the filter</a> and <a href="http://last.fm">last.fm</a>.</p>
<p>A social network as it stands, with all the walled application sections and user research that it cares to have won&#8217;t do it.  There are already many protocols to openly distrubute chunks of user satisfaction, I hope to God we can help them win.</p>
<p>Then we&#8217;ll have a social web. As in a web that helps us to be social.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://colewhitelaw.com/social-media/social-network-social-notwork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
